Skip to content
PlaintiffStack
Compare

AI drafting and medical recordsReviewed

PlaintiffStack vs Eve

PlaintiffStack vs Eve: EveOS, the AI layer for plaintiff firms, compared with a California case management platform for PI, comp and employment.

The short answer

Eve is a fast-growing, well-funded AI platform for plaintiff firms that covers more practice areas than most, including employment, and sits over your existing case management system. PlaintiffStack is a younger case management platform with AI inside it, built only on California rules. Eve suits firms that want broad AI agents across a national practice; PlaintiffStack suits California firms that want the system of record and its AI in one place at a published price.

AI operating layer for plaintiff firms (EveOS)

Eve

Plaintiff firms in personal injury, employment, medical malpractice, disability and workers' comp

Founded
2023 (per Eve's site); legal entity Butler Labs, Inc.
Funding
About $164M: $14M seed (2023), $47M Series A led by a16z (January 2025), $103M Series B led by Spark Capital at a valuation over $1B (September 2025)
Customers
More than 1,400 plaintiff firms and 200,000 active matters (company figures, June 2026)
Practice focus
Personal injury, labor and employment, medical malpractice, Social Security disability, workers' comp
Pricing model
Not published; by demo
Security
SOC 2 Type 2; HIPAA compliant (company site)

Case management and AI on one record

PlaintiffStack

High-volume plaintiff firms in California: personal injury, workers' comp and employment

Price
$250 per case, every app included, no monthly fee. AI usage is billed separately, with an estimate shown before each run.
Practices
PI, workers' comp and employment, on California rules
Security
A BAA with every firm; one US AWS account, models included. SOC 2 in progress

Side by side

PlaintiffStack and Eve compared
WhatEvePlaintiffStack
What it isEveOS: AI agents, intake, a nightly case auditor, research and a self-updating case data layer over your existing systemsCase management with AI case tools built in
Practice areasPI, labor and employment, med mal, Social Security disability, workers' compPersonal injury, workers' comp (applicant) and employment (plaintiff), each with its own phases, pages and case tools
California-specific rulesNational product; no California-specific workflows advertisedBuilt on California rules: WCAB captions and ADJ numbers, CRD right-to-sue deadlines, pleading format. Other states aren't supported
Case management includedNo: Eve says EveOS complements your case management system and pulls data from itYes: intake, contacts, matters, tasks, calendar, documents, client portal, settlement statement and lien tracking
Medical recordsChronologies from full medical files, including scanned charts and faxes, Eve says; Eve Atlas structures records, bills and calls (in beta at launch)Reads searchable PDFs, Word and text files. No OCR yet: scans and faxes aren't read
MonitoringEve Auditor reviews active matters nightlyMorning checks: expiring demands, untouched record requests, IMR deadlines, filing deadlines after right-to-sue
Intake24/7 AI voice intake agent that can send engagement letters for signatureIntake app for your staff; no automatic capture from web forms or ads
PricingNot published$250 per case, every app included. AI usage is billed separately, with an estimated cost shown before each tool runs
ContractNot publicNo monthly fee and no long lock-in contract
SecuritySOC 2 Type 2; HIPAA; case data not used to train shared modelsBAA signed with every firm; one US AWS account, models on Amazon Bedrock; firm data never trains models. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 in progress
IntegrationsFilevine, Clio, Litify, SmartAdvocate and Growpath, named on its workers' comp pageMicrosoft Word and Dropbox live; RingCentral in early access; Outlook, Gmail, Google Drive and others coming

Choose Eve if

  • You want AI agents for intake, records requests, follow-up calls and drafting across a national practice.
  • You run employment cases outside California, or several of the practice areas Eve markets to.
  • You want to keep your case management system and add an AI layer over it.
  • You want AI voice intake that answers calls around the clock.
  • Many of your records arrive as scans and faxes, which Eve says it reads and PlaintiffStack can't yet.

Choose PlaintiffStack if

  • You want one system of record with AI inside it, rather than an AI layer over another system.
  • You practice in California and want CRD, WCAB and civil deadlines computed and shown with their rule.
  • You want a published price: $250 per case, every app included, no monthly fee.
  • You want every AI-proposed fact to wait for a person to accept it.

What Eve does

Eve sells AI to plaintiff firms and, in June 2026, recast its product as EveOS, which it calls an AI operating layer for plaintiff lawyers. EveOS brings together AI agents that draft, propound and respond to discovery, request records and make routine calls; Eve Intake, a voice agent that answers calls, scores leads and can send engagement letters; Eve Auditor, which reviews active matters each night; Eve Research, a database of court opinions; and Eve Atlas and Eve Analyst, a case data layer and plain-language reporting tool that were in beta at launch.

Eve raised a $103M Series B in September 2025 led by Spark Capital at a valuation over $1B, after a $47M Series A led by a16z. At the EveOS launch it reported more than 1,400 plaintiff firms and 200,000 active matters.

Where Eve is strong

  • Breadth of practice. Eve markets to personal injury, labor and employment, medical malpractice, disability and workers' comp firms. It is one of the few large AI vendors with explicit employment tools, such as discovery responses. Its workers' comp page claims chronologies from full medical files including faxes and scanned charts, average weekly wage and impairment math under the state's rating standard, and drafting of petitions, stipulations and compromise and release agreements formatted to the state board, with firms uploading their own state's statutes and rating guides.
  • Agents that do work. Intake, records requests and follow-up calls are handled by agents, which can take real load off staff.
  • It sits over your system. Eve says EveOS complements case management software rather than replacing it, so you don't have to migrate.
  • Momentum. Eve has grown quickly and ships often.

One thing to know when you diligence any vendor: in September 2025 EvenUp sued Eve's parent company in federal court in California, alleging trade-secret misappropriation tied to former employees. These are allegations, not findings, and we found no public statement from Eve about them. Ask about it if it matters to your procurement.

Where PlaintiffStack differs

PlaintiffStack is the case management system, with AI case tools inside it. Intake, matters, tasks, the calendar, documents, the client portal, the settlement statement and lien tracking share one record with the agents. Agents propose facts, deadlines and tasks with the document, page and words they came from, and a person accepts each one. The case summary is the exception: an agent rewrites it, and earlier versions can be restored.

It is built on California rules. For employment, that means a legal chronology of protected activity and adverse actions, a wage and penalty audit, a pre-litigation demand, and checks for civil filing deadlines after a CRD right-to-sue notice and for tolling agreements ending. For workers' comp, it means a benefits audit, a QME cover letter and records index, and IMR deadline checks. See Court rules and Case watch.

The limits are real:

  • California only. Eve serves firms nationally; PlaintiffStack doesn't support other states.
  • No OCR yet. Scans and faxes aren't read; Eve says it reads both.
  • No PD rating calculator. PlaintiffStack doesn't compute permanent disability ratings; Eve's comp page says it applies the state's rating standard.
  • No AI voice intake. PlaintiffStack's intake is for your staff, and it has no automatic capture from web forms or ads.
  • No case-law research. Eve has a research product; PlaintiffStack doesn't.

Pricing

Eve doesn't publish prices. PlaintiffStack is $250 per case, every app included, with no monthly fee and no long lock-in contract. AI usage is billed separately, with an estimated cost shown before each tool runs; how usage is billed is part of your quote. Because Eve runs over your case management system, compare Eve plus your current CMS against PlaintiffStack alone. See pricing.

Who should pick which

Pick Eve if you want a broad set of AI agents over the system you already have, or you practice across many states or practice areas. Pick PlaintiffStack if you're a California PI, comp or employment firm that wants the system of record and its AI in one place, at a published per-case price. Compare more in Eve vs Supio, EvenUp vs Eve and the best AI for employment lawyers.

Questions firms ask

Sources

  1. Eve home page (practice areas, security, products)
  2. Eve: workers' compensation practice page
  3. LawSites: Eve builds on AI workforce launch with EveOS (June 2026)
  4. Eve: Eve is now EveOS
  5. LawSites: Eve raises $103M Series B (September 2025)
  6. PR Newswire: Eve secures $47M Series A (January 2025)
  7. Legal.io: Eve's $14M seed round
  8. Docket: EvenUp, Inc. v. Butler Labs, Inc., N.D. Cal. 4:25-cv-08199
  9. Eve vs Supio (Eve's page)
  10. Supio vs Eve (Supio's page)

Eve is a trademark of its owner, named here only to compare. Facts come from the sources above as of the date shown; prices and features change. If something here is out of date, email privacy@plaintiffstack.com with the page and the source, and we'll correct it.

How we research, check and correct these pages