Does SmartAdvocate have AI?

Yes. SmartIntelligence launched on August 4, 2026, with case chat, demand letter and medical chronology generation, document classification and data extraction, voice agents, reply and negotiation assistants, customizable agents and an MCP server. Pricing has not been disclosed.

Is SmartAdvocate good for California workers' comp?

It has a workers' comp module with custom case types and fields, including disability rating tracking, but its public materials don't describe California-specific features such as EAMS, QME or WCAB. PlaintiffStack ships California comp built in, though without EAMS e-filing or a PD rating calculator.

Which is easier to learn?

Reviewers say SmartAdvocate's depth comes with a learning curve, especially without an administrator. PlaintiffStack's practices arrive configured, and admins change pages and fields by describing them to an assistant. Ask both for a demo on your own case types.

Can PlaintiffStack match SmartAdvocate's integrations?

Not today. SmartAdvocate reports 175+ integrations. PlaintiffStack has Microsoft Word and Dropbox live, RingCentral in early access, and Outlook, Gmail, Google Drive and QuickBooks coming.

Compare

Case managementReviewed October 21, 2026

PlaintiffStack vs SmartAdvocate

PlaintiffStack vs SmartAdvocate: a deeply configurable litigation platform with SmartIntelligence AI, or one California plaintiff record at $250 per case.

The short answer

SmartAdvocate is a long-established, highly configurable platform with modules for mass torts, workers' comp and more, a large integration list and a new AI layer, SmartIntelligence. PlaintiffStack is younger and narrower, with California PI, comp and employment built in, page-cited AI and a published per-case price. Firms that want to configure everything, across states, will find more room in SmartAdvocate.

Configurable case management for high-volume litigation, with built-in AI

SmartAdvocate

Personal injury, mass tort, workers' comp and other litigation firms that want deep configuration

Founded: 2000, per business directories
Practice areas: Personal injury, mass torts, workers' comp, Social Security, veterans and others
AI: SmartIntelligence, launched August 4, 2026: case chat, demand and chronology generation, AI voice agents, custom agents
Integrations: 175+, per buyer guides
Pricing: Not published; Capterra lists from $109 per user per month

Case management and AI on one record

PlaintiffStack

High-volume plaintiff firms in California: personal injury, workers' comp and employment

Price: $250 per case, every app included, no monthly fee. AI usage is billed separately, with an estimate shown before each run.
Practices: PI, workers' comp and employment, on California rules
Security: A BAA with every firm; one US AWS account, models included. SOC 2 in progress

Side by side

PlaintiffStack and SmartAdvocate compared
What	SmartAdvocate	PlaintiffStack
What it is	Cloud case management with a rules engine, deep custom fields and templates, and the SmartIntelligence AI features.	Case management and AI on one record: intake, case work, records, drafting, the client portal and automation.
Built for	Mid-size and large litigation firms, especially PI and mass tort inventories; also smaller firms.	High-volume plaintiff firms in California.
Practice areas	Personal injury, mass torts, workers' comp, Social Security, veterans, family law, criminal defense and others. Used across states.	Personal injury, workers' comp and employment built in. Firms can add other practice areas in Customize, on California rules.
California workers' comp and employment	A workers' comp module with custom case types and fields for disability ratings; its comp page doesn't mention California, EAMS, QME or WCAB. No California employment workflows described.	Built in. Comp: benefits audit, QME cover letter and records index, WCAB petitions, IMR deadline checks. Employment: legal chronology, wage and penalty audit, right-to-sue deadline checks. No PD rating calculator or EAMS e-filing.
AI features and how they're priced	SmartIntelligence: case chat with source references, demand letters, medical chronologies, document classification and extraction, voice agents, negotiation and reply assistants, custom agents. Price not disclosed.	Agents propose facts, deadlines and tasks; a person accepts each one, and drafts cite the page. Each run shows an estimated cost first (typically cents); usage is billed separately as part of your quote.
Medical records and OCR	Medical records integration and AI summaries of records, motions and depositions. OCR details not published.	Reads searchable PDFs, Word and text files, and cites the page. No OCR yet: scans and faxes aren't read.
Client portal, texting and intake	Secure client portal, texting through integrations, eSignature, and automated intake and lead management.	Client portal from a link in any phone browser; texts logged to the case. Intake tracks every lead to a next step, with no automatic capture from web forms yet.
Pricing	Not published. Capterra lists from $109 per user per month; G2 lists an enterprise option with a perpetual license.	$250 per case, every app included, no monthly fee. AI usage billed separately.
Contract and implementation	Subscription or perpetual license. Third-party estimates put implementation at $10,000 to $25,000, with dedicated trainers.	No long lock-in contract. After the demo, a switching plan with dates.
Migration	Done with SmartAdvocate's onboarding team during a go-live process; timelines not published.	We move your cases, contacts and documents and check the result with you before you switch.
Security	Cloud-hosted on SmartAdvocate's servers. We found no public SOC 2 report; ask for its current attestation.	BAA with every firm; one US AWS account, models included (Bedrock); no training on firm data; audit log. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 in progress, no report yet.
Integrations and accounting	175+ integrations reported: eSignature, accounting, texting, records retrieval, legal funding, plus custom integrations and an MCP server for outside AI.	Microsoft Word and Dropbox live; RingCentral in early access; Outlook, Gmail, Google Drive and QuickBooks coming. No trust accounting.

Choose SmartAdvocate if

You want to configure nearly everything: fields, workflows, templates (over 4,000 merge codes) and rules.
You run mass torts, Social Security or veterans cases alongside PI and want one vendor for all of them.
You practice in several states.
You want a long integration list, custom integrations, or an MCP server to connect your own AI tools.
You prefer a perpetual license over a subscription.

Choose PlaintiffStack if

You want California comp and employment built in, with QME, WCAB, IMR and right-to-sue checks, rather than a generic module you configure.
You don't have a dedicated administrator and want a system your team runs on day one.
You want one published price, $250 per case with every app included.
You want every AI-proposed fact cited to its page, accepted by a person, with a cost estimate before each run.

Two approaches to the same firms

SmartAdvocate has been building case management for litigation firms for more than two decades. It is known for depth: a rules engine, custom fields, thousands of merge codes for templates, and modules for personal injury, mass torts, workers' comp, Social Security, veterans and more. On August 4, 2026 it launched SmartIntelligence, an AI layer built into the platform.

PlaintiffStack takes the opposite starting point. Instead of a toolkit a firm configures, it ships three California practices ready to run: personal injury, workers' comp and employment, each with phases, pages, case tools and morning checks.

What SmartAdvocate does well

Configuration. Few platforms let a firm model its process as closely. Reviewers praise its document management and templates.
Breadth. Mass torts, Social Security and veterans work sit alongside PI, which matters for firms that run all of them.
Integrations. Buyer guides count 175 or more, and SmartAdvocate builds custom ones. SmartIntelligence adds an MCP server so outside AI tools can connect.
AI in the platform. SmartIntelligence covers case chat with source references, demand letters, medical chronologies, document classification and data extraction, voice agents for intake, and reply, negotiation and settlement value assistants.

For a large inventory firm with an administrator who enjoys building workflows, SmartAdvocate is a strong choice. See Filevine vs SmartAdvocate and Litify vs SmartAdvocate for the enterprise comparison.

California workers' comp: module vs built in

SmartAdvocate's workers' comp page lists custom case types and fields, medical records integration, a client portal, automated intake and reporting, and tracking for permanent disability ratings through user-defined fields. It doesn't mention California, EAMS, QME or WCAB. A California applicant firm would build those itself. For the head-to-head with a comp-first tool, see MerusCase vs SmartAdvocate.

PlaintiffStack's comp cases open with California phases from intake through QME and WCAB, a benefits audit of TD periods, rates and late-payment exposure, a QME cover letter and records index, WCAB petition drafting, and checks for certified disability with no payment, IMR deadlines after UR denial and records due to the QME. It does not rate permanent disability and does not e-file to EAMS; it tracks the ADJ number.

AI, sources and cost

SmartIntelligence's case chat returns answers with source references. PlaintiffStack works the same way throughout: agents propose facts, deadlines and tasks with the document, page and words they came from, and a person accepts them. Drafts wait for review, and nothing goes out until a person sends it.

On cost, SmartAdvocate hasn't disclosed SmartIntelligence pricing. PlaintiffStack shows an estimated cost before each tool runs, typically cents, and usage is billed separately as part of your quote. One limit to weigh: PlaintiffStack doesn't read scanned records or faxes yet.

Price, setup and switching

SmartAdvocate doesn't publish prices. Capterra lists a start of $109 per user per month, G2 lists an enterprise option from $1,995 with a perpetual license, and third-party estimates put implementation at $10,000 to $25,000. Ask for a written quote that separates licenses, implementation, support and AI.

PlaintiffStack is $250 per case with every app included, no monthly fee and no long lock-in contract. We move your cases, contacts and documents and check the result with you. Before you switch from any configured system, list the custom fields and reports your team relies on; the switching guide has a checklist.

Questions to ask on both demos

Show a California workers' comp case from intake to a QME report. Which pages, fields and deadlines are there by default, and which would we build?
Show a demand drafted from real records. Where does each fact come from, and how does a reviewer check it?
What does the AI cost, and how is it billed: per user, per run or per case?
Who runs configuration after go-live, and what happens when that person leaves?
What does the migration include, how long does it take, and how do we check the result before we switch?

Ask both vendors to answer on your own case types, not a sample matter.

Questions firms ask

Sources

SmartAdvocate is a trademark of its owner, named here only to compare. Facts come from the sources above as of the date shown; prices and features change. If something here is out of date, email privacy@plaintiffstack.com with the page and the source, and we'll correct it.

How we research, check and correct these pages

Keep comparing

Thinking about SmartAdvocate? See PlaintiffStack on your own case types first.

Book a demo See the price