Precedent alternatives for plaintiff firms

Why firms look beyond Precedent

• As of October 21, 2026, Precedent's website redirects to a domain marketplace, and we found no company announcement explaining why.
• Firms need a vendor they can reach for support, data export and BAA questions.
• Reported pricing varied across sources, from $100-$175 per letter in 2024 to pricing adjusted to case complexity.
• A demand-only tool leaves records, deadlines and settlement work in other systems.

The options

1. 1.

   PlaintiffStack

   Case management and AI on one record

   Built for

   High-volume plaintiff firms in California: personal injury, workers' comp and employment

   Price

   $250 per case, every app included, no monthly fee. AI usage is billed separately, with an estimate shown before each run.

   Bottom line

   Our own product, listed first because this is our page. It is young and California-only, and it doesn't read scanned records yet.

   PlaintiffStack vs Precedent
2. 2.

   EvenUp

   AI demand letters, medical chronologies and outsourced pre-lit

   Built for

   Personal injury firms, from small practices to the largest PI firms in the country

   Price

   EvenUp doesn't publish prices. It moved to per-case pricing in 2025 and sells Pre-Litigation as a Service (PLAAS) as a subscription; it reported more than $10M in PLAAS subscriptions sold during testing. Third-party and competitor estimates put a standard demand around $300, rising to $500-$800 or more with add-ons. Treat those as estimates and ask for a written quote.

   Bottom line

   EvenUp is the most established AI vendor in personal injury, with years of demand data, human reviewers and now an outsourced pre-litigation service. PlaintiffStack is a younger, California-only case management platform for PI, workers' comp and employment, priced per case. Firms that want to hand off demand or pre-lit work should look hard at EvenUp; firms that want one system of record with AI inside it, run by their own staff, should look at PlaintiffStack.

   PlaintiffStack vs EvenUp
3. 3.

   ProPlaintiff

   AI demands, chronologies and agentic case management for PI

   Built for

   Personal injury firms, from solo practices to larger firms

   Price

   As of October 21, 2026, ProPlaintiff's pricing page offers a demo rather than listed plans. Earlier third-party roundups reported plans starting at $99 a month for one seat; confirm current pricing with the company.

   Bottom line

   ProPlaintiff and PlaintiffStack are both young, AI-first platforms that combine case management with drafting. ProPlaintiff is aimed squarely at personal injury, with an AI paralegal, demand and chronology tools and video analysis. PlaintiffStack is narrower geographically (California only) but ships workers' comp and employment as full practices, at a published per-case price.

   PlaintiffStack vs ProPlaintiff
4. 4.

   CaseMark

   Usage-priced AI for litigation documents (Para)

   Built for

   Litigation teams and attorneys across practice areas, plus court reporters

   Price

   CaseMark publishes its prices. Para is $20 per seat a month on Standard and $100 on Pro, with seat fees credited to a usage wallet and extra usage billed at cost; Enterprise is by agreement. Medical summaries are $25 plus $0.01 per page, capped at $100 for up to 25,000 pages, with larger sets quoted.

   Bottom line

   CaseMark is an inexpensive, horizontal AI tool for litigation documents, with published per-seat and per-page prices that are hard to beat for medical summaries. PlaintiffStack is a case management system for California PI, workers' comp and employment with AI case tools inside it. Firms that only need cheap, cited first drafts should look at CaseMark; firms that want the case and its deadlines in one place should look at PlaintiffStack.

   PlaintiffStack vs CaseMark
5. 5.

   Supio

   Agentic AI for medical records, chronologies and demands

   Built for

   Personal injury and mass tort plaintiff law firms

   Price

   Supio doesn't publish prices; its site sends buyers to a demo. Third-party roundups describe quote-based pricing, per seat or bundled. Ask for the full cost, including any per-case or volume terms, in writing.

   Bottom line

   Supio is a well-funded AI platform for PI and mass tort firms that works on top of the case management system you already have, with Westlaw research and a strong records and damages product. PlaintiffStack is a younger case management platform for California PI, workers' comp and employment, with AI inside it. Keep your CMS and add Supio if you like your system; consider PlaintiffStack if you want to replace the system and you practice in California.

   PlaintiffStack vs Supio
6. 6.

   Eve

   AI operating layer for plaintiff firms (EveOS)

   Built for

   Plaintiff firms in personal injury, employment, medical malpractice, disability and workers' comp

   Price

   Eve doesn't publish prices; its site directs buyers to a demo. Third-party roundups describe per-seat or enterprise quotes. Get the full cost, including agents and intake, in writing.

   Bottom line

   Eve is a fast-growing, well-funded AI platform for plaintiff firms that covers more practice areas than most, including employment, and sits over your existing case management system. PlaintiffStack is a younger case management platform with AI inside it, built only on California rules. Eve suits firms that want broad AI agents across a national practice; PlaintiffStack suits California firms that want the system of record and its AI in one place at a published price.

   PlaintiffStack vs Eve